Ubuntu beats Fedora: Long-term support

The Fedora Legacy Project is shutting down. The goal of the Fedora Legacy Project was to provide security and critical bug fix errata packages for Fedora Core distributions in maintenance mode. Fedora users can no longer get support for releases older than Fedora Core 5, which was released in March, 2006. If you installed Fedora more than 9 months ago, then you need to upgrade if you want to get security updates.


People who use Linux, especially in commercial deployments, need to know that they can get security updates for a reasonable amount time. The Fedora Legacy Project provided an important service, but it was only sponsored by volunteers in the Fedora community. Red Hat decided not to provide this support, mainly because they wanted to encourage people to purchase their "Enterprise Linux" product. To illustrate Red Hat's position on this, you should read the answer to this question on the Fedora FAQ:

Why should I pay for Red Hat Enterprise Linux when Fedora is free? What is the relationship between Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux?

I can understand Red Hat trying to increase sales of their products, but this is just irresponsible. Red Hat is using the Fedora community as a testing and development environment for their products. Red Hat benefits from Fedora community contributions, and they get an excellent marketing and sales vehicle to potential customers.

The lack of long-term support in Fedora is contrasted by the solid and predictable support that Ubuntu releases provide. I have posted before about Ubuntu's amazing release schedule. Most Ubuntu releases get 1.5 years of support, but periodically there will be a LTS (long-term-support) version that provides 3 years of desktop support and 5 years of server support.

It is likely that the Fedora Legacy Project will be replaced with a similar entity that provides long-term support for Fedora releases. Let's hope that Red Hat steps up to the plate and invests resources to make this happen.

Update: Christer pointed out that there will be a similar situation with Ubuntu support. Ubuntu 5.10 is supported for 1.5 years (18 months) which ends in April 2007. If you installed Ubuntu 5.10 in July 2006 (right before Ubuntu 6.06 came out) then you would only get 10 months of support. For all other releases, the minimum amount of support is 12 months if you install a version the day before a new version comes out.

The main point of this post is still true: The future of legacy support for Fedora is now unknown, and Red Hat should spend resources to make this happen.

Comments

  1. Anonymous1/02/2007 12:20 AM

    Why? Because you want it? Because Linux should be free as in free loaders?

    The lack of volunteers is proof that Fedora Legacy was no longer filling a critical need. Red Hat's deal with the community is "we'll help create a free, cutting edge distribution, but if you want long term support either pay for it or do it yourself." Red Hat has made that clear from the beginning.

    If anyone wants a free, cutting edge distro with frequent releases more or less on time, Fedora is one of several. If anyone wants a free distribution with long term support, there are pleny of other distros available but Fedora isn't one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1/02/2007 4:11 AM

    As far as I can tell this was simply an announcement that the older releases are no longer supported but the Legacy project is still going. Probably not much different than an announcement we'll see soon about Breezy no longer being supported.

    I don't think its a big deal really..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tristan Rhodes1/02/2007 4:32 AM

    anonymous:

    You make a good point. I guess we'll have to see if the community can meet this need. If not, will this have a negative impact on the popularity of Fedora? I certainly think so.

    Christer:

    If you read the announcement, it says that the Fedora Legacy Project is "shutting down". It also says, "The current model for supporting maintenance distributions is being
    re-examined." We'll just have to wait and see how this all works out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. blondie1/03/2007 3:33 PM

    Hey, stop for a moment! You can't consider seriously to use Fedora in commercial/pruductive environment. It's not its goal.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tristan Rhodes1/15/2007 3:34 PM

    For comparison purposes, I also want to document the long-term support available for OpenSuse. Based on the link below, OpenSuse gets 2 years of security updates.

    http://en.opensuse.org/SUSE_Linux_Lifetime

    This puts OpenSuse in about the same class as Ubuntu, which has 1.5 years of support with periodic LTS releases with 3 years of support.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using the Cisco console in Linux

Image
Introduction People who work with Cisco network equipment need to be able to connect to the console port on their devices. In Windows, you can simply fire up HyperTerminal to get basic access to your devices. If you are using Linux, then you need to know how this can be done with an application called Minicom . Hardware First, you are going to need a Cisco console cable , a Cisco device, and a computer. If your computer has a serial port , then you can use the standard console cable that comes with every Cisco device. If you do not have a serial port (like most new laptops), then you need to purchase a USB to Serial adapter that supports Linux. This device will allow you to use the standard Cisco cable, which has a serial port on one end. Install Minicom You can easily install Minicom by using "System > Administration > Synaptic Package Manager". Search for "minicom" and choose to install the package. Click "Apply" and Minicom should be insta
Read more

What it takes to make Ubuntu ready for use

I recently installed Ubuntu 6.10 on a new PC at work. In this post I will document all the steps I had to perform to get it ready for everyday use. Each step is assigned a level of difficulty, which I define below: Very Easy Step can be completed without using the command prompt Intuitive to complete Easy Step can be completed without using the command prompt May require searching to find the right place to make the change Medium Requires a single command to be entered at the command prompt Requires searching internet resources to find the solution Hard Requires multiple commands to be entered at the command prompt Requires searching internet resources to find the solution Very Hard Requires multiple commands to be entered at the command prompt Requires searching internet resources to find the solution Requires the user to manually edit a configuration file These criteria are quite strict, because I believe that using an operating system should be intuitive, and not require any spec
Read more

Five ways to use Windows apps in Linux

Image
1. Use an open source alternative instead When someone asks me if they can run "Windows Application X" on Linux, the first thing I tell them is to look for an open source alternative. For most Windows applications, there will be a high-quality open source alternative that can meet their needs. The biggest hurdle for non-Linux people is simply knowing that these alternative exist and how to find them. The best place I have found to search for these applications is at www.osalt.com . On that site, you can enter the name of the Windows application and it will list the open source alternatives that provide similar functionality. Be sure to check it out. 2. Buy a commercial product that was designed for Linux If you cannot find an open source alternative, and you have not already purchased a Windows application, then you should consider purchasing a commercial product that was designed for Linux. Here is a story of a civil engineer who wanted to find an open source replacemen
Read more