Comparing a hypothetical donation of $25 million dollars

I believe that contributing to open source software is the most efficient kind of charity and philanthropy. (I'll leave it to someone else to convince the IRS to give me a tax write-off for the hours I spend on improving open source.) To illustrate this, let us consider a hypothetical $25 million dollar donation made by both Bill Gates and Mark Shuttleworth.


Bill Gates could use his $25 million dollar donation to donate free licenses of Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate ($400/each) and Microsoft Office Professional ($500/each). At those prices, he could give away about 30,000 copies of that software. Many people would be able to use the software, but due to license restrictions, only 30,000 people could use the software at the same time. It is nice that Bill Gates decided to help these 30,000 people, but lets look at another way that this money could be spent.

Mark Shuttleworth uses his $25 million dollar donation to build upon an existing open source operating system (Debian Linux). He creates Ubuntu Linux, which is made available to everyone for free. This means that his contribution has the potential to help the entire world population of 6.5 billion people!

Who's contribution will have the greatest positive impact on the world? By my estimate, the money spent on open source helped 20,000 times more people than the proprietary software donation. That is why I call open source software the most efficient use of charity resources.

(Note: In reality, Mark has already contributed a sum of around $25 million dollars to fund the creation and development of Ubuntu. In comparison, Bill Gates has contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to his charity.

However, if Mr. Gates truly wants his money to be the most effective at helping the world, then he should contribute some of his money to open source software. Yes, I understand that open source software does not directly feed starving people, but it has the potential to help their situation.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using the Cisco console in Linux

Image
Introduction People who work with Cisco network equipment need to be able to connect to the console port on their devices. In Windows, you can simply fire up HyperTerminal to get basic access to your devices. If you are using Linux, then you need to know how this can be done with an application called Minicom . Hardware First, you are going to need a Cisco console cable , a Cisco device, and a computer. If your computer has a serial port , then you can use the standard console cable that comes with every Cisco device. If you do not have a serial port (like most new laptops), then you need to purchase a USB to Serial adapter that supports Linux. This device will allow you to use the standard Cisco cable, which has a serial port on one end. Install Minicom You can easily install Minicom by using "System > Administration > Synaptic Package Manager". Search for "minicom" and choose to install the package. Click "Apply" and Minicom should be insta
Read more

Linux NIC teaming recommendations

Image
Introduction In my job as a network engineer, I am constantly looking for ways to increase the availability of the network. This is especially true in the data center, where services are expected to always be available. One of the ways to increase the network availability of a server is by using multiple network interfaces. This technique has many different names, but I am just going to call it NIC teaming. Purpose of NIC Teaming NIC teaming increases network availability by removing single-points-of-failure (SPOF). These SPOFs are components that will cause a service outage if they become unavailable. If we consider a single network connection from your server to your switch, we can identify quite a few SPOFs: Server NIC failure Network cable failure (such as being cut or unplugged) Network switch failure (such as a planned firmware upgrade or unplanned outage) Methods of NIC Teaming The reason I am writing this blog is to help people understand the different options for NIC team
Read more

What it takes to make Ubuntu ready for use

I recently installed Ubuntu 6.10 on a new PC at work. In this post I will document all the steps I had to perform to get it ready for everyday use. Each step is assigned a level of difficulty, which I define below: Very Easy Step can be completed without using the command prompt Intuitive to complete Easy Step can be completed without using the command prompt May require searching to find the right place to make the change Medium Requires a single command to be entered at the command prompt Requires searching internet resources to find the solution Hard Requires multiple commands to be entered at the command prompt Requires searching internet resources to find the solution Very Hard Requires multiple commands to be entered at the command prompt Requires searching internet resources to find the solution Requires the user to manually edit a configuration file These criteria are quite strict, because I believe that using an operating system should be intuitive, and not require any spec
Read more